All services

The model never sees the real record.

Plenty of AI work stalls at legal review, because the honest answer to what leaves our network is everything. A data boundary fixes that: sensitive fields are encoded before the request and restored after the response, so the provider processes structure without ever holding a name, an account number or an address. It adds single-digit milliseconds and it changes the conversation with compliance.

Dayshours
Month-end reconciliation
55%80%
Plans completed without a human
On-device
Live-meeting detection

In short

Bigcircle puts reversible, format-preserving tokenization in front of the provider call, so the model never sees the raw record and the structure of the answer survives. A per-request record says what was encoded, and a leakage suite in CI fails if a raw value can reach a provider. Encode and decode add single-digit milliseconds.

Key facts

Definition

A data boundary encodes sensitive fields before the provider call and restores them after the response, so the provider processes structure without the raw record.

How Bigcircle does it

  1. Bigcircle classifies what is actually sensitive with the person who owns the risk, because encoding every field destroys the answer.
  2. Reversible, format-preserving tokenization runs in front of the provider call, and a per-request record says what was encoded.
  3. A leakage suite in CI fails if a raw value can reach a provider, and the answer is restored with the values the client's systems already hold.

Comparison

Sending the raw record means the provider holds the identity, while tokenization lets the model keep the structure of the answer without that identity.

Built for production, not the demo.

01 / DATA BOUNDARY

A data boundary in front of the model, for teams who cannot send raw records to a provider.

For teams who cannot send raw records to a provider. Encode on the way out, decode on the way back, so sensitive fields never leave your side.

Usually shipped with

  • Production AI engineering
  • Guardrails and safety layers
  • On-device and edge inference

Not a bundle to buy. Whichever you start from, the engagement covers what the build actually needs.

02 / Scope

What we build.

  • Detection and encoding of personal data before a request leaves
  • Decoding on return, so the answer is complete for your users
  • Reversible tokenization rather than lossy masking where structure matters
  • Configurable field policies per data class and per jurisdiction
  • A record of what was redacted, for the review that follows

03 / Outcomes

What you can ship.

  • AI approved by legal and compliance
  • Third-party models used without third-party data exposure
  • A defensible answer to what leaves your network

04 / Deliverables

Artefacts, not activities.

  • The boundary layerDetection, encoding and decoding in front of every provider call.
  • Field policiesPer-data-class and per-jurisdiction rules, configurable without a deploy.
  • A leakage test suiteTests that fail if a raw value can reach a provider, runnable in CI.

05 / Stack

What it is built on.

Detection
Named entity recognition / Pattern rules
Encoding
Reversible tokenization / Format-preserving
Policy
Per-class rules / Jurisdiction config
Assurance
Leakage tests / Per-request records

06 / Why us

Reversible tokenization, not masking

Masking destroys the structure a model needs to reason. Tokenization preserves it, so the answer is as good as it would have been on raw data, and the raw data still never leaves.

Single-digit milliseconds

The encode and decode cost is small enough that it is never the reason a request is slow. That matters, because a boundary teams disable under load is not a boundary.

Built for the review, not just the risk

On FinSight the anonymization work existed so the audit could be passed, not only so the data was safe. The per-request record is what makes that conversation short.

A path from your problem to production.

  1. Week 1

    Classify what is actually sensitive

    Not every field is PII and over-redaction destroys the answer. We work through your data with whoever owns the risk.

  2. Week 1-2

    Encode before the boundary

    Detection and reversible tokenization in front of the provider call, so structure survives and identity does not cross.

  3. Week 2-3

    Decode on return

    The answer is restored for your users, complete, with the original values your systems already hold.

  4. Week 3-5

    Prove it

    A record of what was redacted per request, and the test suite that shows nothing leaked, for the review that follows.

Dark ink blooming and dispersing through clear liquid

Production-proven

Built by engineers who've already shipped this in production.

The questions buyers actually ask.

Does redaction hurt answer quality?

Barely, when tokenization is reversible and format-preserving. The model reasons over structure, and structure survives. Lossy masking is what degrades answers.

Which fields get redacted?

The ones you and your risk owner decide. We bring a default set for common regimes and then work through your actual data, because over-redaction is its own failure.

Can we prove nothing leaked?

Yes, and that is the deliverable that matters. A per-request record of what was encoded, plus a CI suite that fails if a raw value can reach a provider.

What about data already sent?

Out of scope for this layer, and worth saying plainly. This stops the next request, not the last one; historical exposure is a separate conversation.

Let's scope your PII redaction and data boundaries build.

Tell us where you are and what you're trying to ship. We'll come back with a concrete plan, the right engineers, and a path to production, not a generic pitch.

Reply within 2h

We store your name, email, company, and message, and email a copy to hello@bigcircle.ai. Read the privacy page and the terms.