All services

Stop a bad action before it happens.

A guardrail that runs after the action is a log entry. We put the check in front: input validation, output constraints, and an action policy that evaluates what an agent is about to do against rules you wrote, before the call is made. Where the stakes justify it, a human approves. Every decision, allowed or refused, lands in the record.

40%98%
Five-part template adherence
10%4%
Template errors before deploy
55%80%
Plans completed without a human

Built for production, not the demo.

01 / GUARDRAILS

Policy checks around model output and agent actions, for systems where a bad action is expensive.

For systems where a bad action is expensive. Input and output validation, action policies that stop a call before it happens, and human checkpoints where stakes justify one.

Usually shipped with

  • AI agent development
  • Production AI engineering
  • PII redaction and data boundaries

Not a bundle to buy. Whichever you start from, the engagement covers what the build actually needs.

02 / Scope

What we build.

  • Input and output validation against schemas you define
  • Action policies evaluated before a tool call, not after
  • Human-in-the-loop checkpoints scoped to high-stakes actions
  • Refusal behavior that is explicit rather than emergent
  • Every verdict recorded, including the ones that allowed the action

03 / Outcomes

What you can ship.

  • Autonomy that is safe enough to leave running
  • Policy enforced in code rather than in a prompt
  • An audit trail of what was refused and why

04 / Deliverables

Artefacts, not activities.

  • A written policyThe rules, in a form both your compliance reviewer and the runtime can read.
  • The enforcement layerInput validation, output constraints and pre-action policy checks, in your codebase.
  • Approval routingHuman checkpoints scoped to high-stakes actions, with the context an approver needs.

05 / Stack

What it is built on.

Validation
Schema enforcement / Structured output
Policy
Pre-action checks / Allow/deny rules
Human loop
Approval routing / Escalation paths
Record
Verdict logging / Audit trails

06 / Why us

The check runs before the action

Most guardrail work inspects output text. The expensive failures are actions, so the policy evaluates the intended tool call and can refuse it before anything happens.

Policy in code, not in the prompt

On Brandiligence a validator enforces the approved-source rule; the model cannot cite outside the index even if instructed to. Prompt-level rules degrade under pressure, and validators do not.

Refusals are recorded too

An audit trail of what was allowed is half a record. The refused actions are the ones that prove the layer is doing anything.

A path from your problem to production.

  1. Week 1

    Write the policy down

    What must never happen, stated as rules rather than as prompt instructions. A policy that lives in a prompt is a suggestion.

  2. Week 1-2

    Validate at the boundary

    Input schemas and output constraints enforced in code, so a malformed result fails before it reaches a caller.

  3. Week 2-3

    Gate the action, not the sentence

    The check runs before the tool call. A guardrail that inspects text after the transfer went through is a log entry.

  4. Week 3-5

    Add the human where stakes justify it

    Approval routing for the narrow set of actions that warrant it, with enough context in the request for the approver to decide in seconds.

Frosted glass panels stacked in strict alignment

Production-proven

Built by engineers who've already shipped this in production.

The questions buyers actually ask.

Will this make the agent refuse useful things?

Tuned badly, yes, which is why refusal rates are measured alongside safety. A layer that blocks a third of legitimate work has failed differently but just as completely.

Is this the same as content moderation?

No. Moderation judges text; this judges actions. The question is not whether a sentence is acceptable but whether a transfer, a deletion or a send should proceed.

How much latency does it add?

Schema checks are microseconds; policy evaluation is single-digit milliseconds. Human approval is as slow as your approver, which is why it is scoped narrowly.

Can our compliance team read the rules?

That is the point of writing the policy as rules rather than burying it in prompts. One document serves both the reviewer and the runtime.

Let's scope your guardrails and safety layers build.

Tell us where you are and what you're trying to ship. We'll come back with a concrete plan, the right engineers, and a path to production, not a generic pitch.