All services

When one agent stops being enough.

A single agent holds one context window and one set of instructions, and past a certain complexity it starts dropping the thread. Orchestration splits the work across specialists with a supervisor deciding who runs when, explicit handoffs so nothing is assumed, and one trace across the whole run so a failure is attributable to a step rather than to the system.

55%80%
Plans completed without a human
10%4%
Template errors before deploy
40–60%
Of recurring exec rituals automated

Built for production, not the demo.

01 / ORCHESTRATION

Multi-agent systems, for work that outgrew a single agent.

For work that outgrew one agent. Specialist agents under a supervisor, explicit handoffs, and one trace across the whole run.

Usually shipped with

  • AI agent development
  • MCP servers and tool layers
  • AI observability

Not a bundle to buy. Whichever you start from, the engagement covers what the build actually needs.

02 / Scope

What we build.

  • Supervisor and worker agents with explicit, inspectable handoffs
  • Shared state that survives a handoff without re-sending the whole history
  • Per-agent tool scoping, so a worker cannot reach past its job
  • One trace spanning every agent in a run, not one log per agent
  • Failure isolation, so a bad step retries instead of sinking the run

03 / Outcomes

What you can ship.

  • Workflows too complex for a single agent to hold
  • Research and analysis pipelines with specialist stages
  • Runs you can debug at the step level

04 / Deliverables

Artefacts, not activities.

  • The orchestration layerSupervisor, workers, handoff contracts and shared state, running in your environment.
  • Per-agent evaluation setsA success criterion and a labelled set for each specialist, so a regression is attributable.
  • Run tracesOne trace per run spanning every agent, with cost and latency per step.

05 / Stack

What it is built on.

Orchestration
LangGraph / Custom supervisors / State machines / CrewAI / AutoGen
Models
Claude / GPT / Open models
Runtime
Python / TypeScript / Queues
Observability
Traces / Per-agent evals

06 / Why us

We ship the supervisor before the workers

The orchestration layer is where multi-agent systems actually fail, and it is the part most builds leave until last. Getting it right first is why our runs stay debuggable as the agent count grows.

Every worker is evaluated alone

A chain is only as good as its weakest step, and a step nobody measured is the one that breaks. Each specialist gets its own success criteria before it joins the chain.

One trace, not one log per agent

On Solarpunk, dynamic tool discovery across more than a hundred tools stayed debuggable because the whole run reads as a single trace rather than as five disconnected logs.

A path from your problem to production.

  1. Week 1

    Map the work before splitting it

    We write down the steps a person actually performs, where judgment enters, and which parts genuinely need separate context. Most work that looks like it needs five agents needs two and a better tool.

  2. Week 1-2

    Build the supervisor first

    The supervisor decides who runs and when, and it is the part that fails quietly. We build and test it against recorded runs before any worker exists.

  3. Week 2-4

    Add workers one at a time

    Each specialist ships with its own tool scope and its own success check. A worker that cannot be evaluated alone cannot be trusted in a chain.

  4. Week 4-6

    Trace the whole run

    One trace across every agent, with handoffs and shared state visible, so a failure is attributable to a step rather than to the system.

The controls are whole-run, not per-agent.

A supervisor decomposes the goal, assigns work to specialised workers, and merges what comes back into one answer rather than four. Workers share state and hand off to each other directly instead of routing everything through the supervisor. What makes it survivable in production is that the budget covers the entire run rather than each agent separately, and a detector stops a run that has stalled or started looping — the two failures that turn a multi-agent demo into an unbounded bill.

A GOALDECOMPOSEASSIGNMERGESTOPthe supervisorSHARED STATEWORKER · RESEARCHWORKER · WRITEWORKER · CHECKSTALLED OR LOOPING?MERGEone answer, not fourGUARDRAILSchecked before it actsYOUR SYSTEMSit is stopped, not left runninghandoffONE BUDGET, ALL AGENTSWHICH AGENT DID WHAT
A pale topological mesh of connected nodes receding into dark space

Production-proven

Built by engineers who've already shipped this in production.

The questions buyers actually ask.

How do I know I need more than one agent?

You usually do not. The honest test is whether the steps need genuinely different context or different tools. If one agent is failing because the prompt is long, the fix is a better tool or a smaller scope, not a second agent.

Does this cost more to run?

Often less. Specialists use smaller models for the steps that do not need a frontier one, and the supervisor stops work early when a step fails, rather than paying for a full run that was doomed at step two.

What happens when one agent fails?

The step retries in isolation. Failure isolation is designed in from the start, so a single bad tool call does not sink a run that was otherwise fine.

Can we run this on our own infrastructure?

Yes. The orchestration layer has no hosted dependency; it runs wherever your other services run.

Let's scope your agent orchestration build.

Tell us where you are and what you're trying to ship. We'll come back with a concrete plan, the right engineers, and a path to production, not a generic pitch.